Wednesday, 2 May 2012
evaluation questions
1. In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
2. How effective is the combination of your main product and ancillary texts?
3. What have you learned from your audience feedback?
4. How did you use media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?
2. How effective is the combination of your main product and ancillary texts?
3. What have you learned from your audience feedback?
4. How did you use media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?
PHOTOS FOR ANCILIARYS
THIS IS ME, HOLDING PHOTOCOPIED MONEY TO BE THE BACKGROUND OF OUR DOUBLE PAGE SPREAD THIS WAS THEN EDITED. I WAS DRESSED IN BLACK TO NOT DRAW ATTENTION TO MYSELF.
MY TEACHER SAID THAT THE CHANNEL 4 LOGO WAS MISSING BUT THE LAYOUT WAS GOOD. THIS WAS INSPIRED BY THE 'MY BIG FAT GYPSY WEDDING BILBOARDS'
THIS WAS AN IMAGE I TOOK TO SHOW CONSUMERISM AND MONEY WHICH WOULD BE THE LINK. IT WAS THEN EDITED TO HIGHLIGHT THE IDENTIFICATION AND BANK CARD AND MONEY
THIS IS ME POSING WITH A WEIGHTED BASKET SHOWING HOW IT IS WEIGHING THE PUBLIC DOWN
Props setting and costume
Draft 1:
Presenter dressed in all black so the audience would focus on what she said rather than what she looked like. Our teacher advised us against this because it didnt fit the mise en scene relating to the presenters age.
The milkshake, was a prop which was used to lead the audience to think about the sexualisation of food while clips of sexual milkshakes from music videos were put into the documentary.
Filming by marks and spencer set the scene but as a down side made the documentary seem like it was biased to the store because we asked people in the same location.
Draft 3:
The settings were confused and had poor lighting.
The presenter had changed and wore bright clothes which was better for the audience.
Props were not used so they didnt distract the audience
Final Draft:
Costume remained the same.
Filmed by cafes and bistro looking buildings.
We filmed in building that looked similar to offices then it cut away to the sociologist, which elluded that we were at her office
We did not use actors just members of the public who were briefed.
Presenter dressed in all black so the audience would focus on what she said rather than what she looked like. Our teacher advised us against this because it didnt fit the mise en scene relating to the presenters age.
The milkshake, was a prop which was used to lead the audience to think about the sexualisation of food while clips of sexual milkshakes from music videos were put into the documentary.
Filming by marks and spencer set the scene but as a down side made the documentary seem like it was biased to the store because we asked people in the same location.
Draft 3:
The settings were confused and had poor lighting.
The presenter had changed and wore bright clothes which was better for the audience.
Props were not used so they didnt distract the audience
Final Draft:
Costume remained the same.
Filmed by cafes and bistro looking buildings.
We filmed in building that looked similar to offices then it cut away to the sociologist, which elluded that we were at her office
We did not use actors just members of the public who were briefed.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

















